ABSTRACT
Aims: Little is known about risk factors for both Long COVID and somatic symptoms that develop in individuals without a history of COVID-19 in response to the pandemic. There is reason to assume an interplay between pathophysiological mechanisms and psychosocial factors in the etiology of symptom persistence. This study investigates specific risk factors for somatic symptom deterioration in a cohort of German adults with and without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Method(s): German healthcare professionals underwent SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody testing and completed self-rating questionnaires at baseline and 21 months later between April 2020 and February 2022. Differences in variables between the time points were analyzed and a regression analysis was performed to predict somatic symptom deterioration at follow-up. Result(s): Seven hundred fifty-one adults completed both assessments. Until follow-up, n = 58 had contracted SARS-CoV-2 confirmed by serology. Between baseline and follow-up, signs of mental and physical strain increased significantly in the sample. Symptom expectations associated with COVID-19 and a self-reported history of COVID-19, but not serologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, significantly predicted somatic symptom deterioration at follow-up. A further predictor was baseline psychological symptom burden. Conclusion(s): This study supports a disease-overarching biopsychosocial model for the development of burdensome somatic symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic and supports research findings that symptom burden may be more related to the psychosocial effects of the pandemic than to infection itself. Future studies on Long COVID should include SARS-CoV-2 negative control groups and consider symptom burden prior to infection in order to avoid an overestimation of prevalence rates.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Up to now,reliable results regarding the efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), especially under current myeloma-directed therapy, are scarcely available. Here, we report an analysis describing the level of post-vaccination antibody titers after the 1 stand 2 ndanti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination depending on therapy, remission status, and B- and T-cell numbers in patients with MM and related plasma cell neoplasia. Methods: This observational single-center study included patients aged ≥18 years with diagnoses of MM, monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance (MGCS), or systemic light-chain amyloidosis (AL) who were eligible for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination according to the International Myeloma Society recommendations. Patients with prior COVID-19 infections were excluded. Samples were analyzed for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies using the quantitative anti-spike IgG (SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD IgG, cut off ≥ 0.8 BAU/ml) according to manufacturer's recommendations. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody titer (SP-AbT) were evaluated after at least 7 days after the 1 stand 2 ndvaccination, respectively. This study was performed between January 1 - July 15, 2021, at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, as part of the COVIDOUT trial (NCT04779346). All patients provided written informed consent. Aims of this study were to evaluate a possible correlation between SP-AbT and CD19+ B lymphocyte count, as well as to identify other factors impacting vaccination response. Results: 82 patients who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (including 67 patients with mRNA-, 8 with vector-based vaccines and 4 heterologous vaccinations) were included. 74 patients had diagnosis of MM, 4 of MGCS/smoldering MM and 4 of AL. Median age was 68 years (range 35-85) and 49 patients were male. In total, 37 patients (45.1%) received anti-CD38- and 2 (2.4%) anti-SLAMF7-targeting therapies at the time of vaccination, 52 (63.4%) patients received immunomodulatory drug (IMID)-based treatments and 13 patients (15.9%) were under active surveillance. 59% of patients had newly diagnosed and 41% refractory or relapsed disease. In total, 75.6% of all patients were in deep remissions (very good partial remission or better). Assessment of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers took place in median 23 days (range [r] 8-63 days) after the 1 stand 21 days (r: 6-53) after the 2 ndvaccination. A positive SARS-CoV-2 SP-AbT was detected in 31.9% of assessable patients with an overall median SP-AbT of 0 BAU/ml (r: 0-10328, mean 202.36) after the 1 stvaccination and increased up to 88.9% (median SP-AbT of 216.87 BAU/ml, r: 0-25720, mean 2139.29) after 2 ndvaccination. Of the patients not showing positive SP-AbT after the 1 stvaccination, 80.9% became positive after 2 ndvaccination, while 19.1 % remained negative. Median SP-AbT titer was significantly lower compared to patients who became positive already after 1 stvaccination (51.04 vs. 2191.87 BAU/ml, p<0.0001). Regarding immune status, a CD19+ B cell count of median 33.5/µl (r: 1-696/µl) was seen in the overall patient cohort;in patients with negative SP-AbT, median CD19+ B cell numbers were significantly lower compared to patients with positive titers (median CD19+ B cells: 2.0 vs. 52.5/µl, p=0.005). Overall, CD19+ B lymphocyte numbers correlate significantly with positive SP-AbT results and were identified as predictive factor in multivariate analysis. The previously suggested threshold of 30 CD19+ B cells/µl as being predictive for SP-AbT development could be validated. SP-AbT concentration was significantly lower with older age. Furthermore, median SP-AbT were significantly lower in patients with current anti-CD38 directed therapy (median SP-AbT: 1085.4 vs. 62.05 BAU/ml, p < 0.005). Conclusions: In spite of immunodeficiency and immunosuppressive therapy, most MM patients develop SP-AbT. However, about 11% of MM patients failed to develop SP-AbT after full vaccination, and thus remain on risk for COVID-19. Higher counts of CD19+ B lymphocytes, ith a threshold of 30 CD19+ B lymphocytes/µl, are predictive for SP-AbT formation and may further help to identify patients at higher risk of insufficient vaccination response in whom control of vaccination success and potential third vaccination are particularly important. Disclosures: Bokemeyer: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding;Inside: Research Funding;IO Biotech: Research Funding;Eisai: Research Funding;Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding;Gilead Sciences: Research Funding;Blueprint Medicine: Research Funding;BerGenBio: Research Funding;Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding;Isofol Medical: Research Funding;AOK Health insurance: Consultancy;GSO: Consultancy;Bayer Schering Pharma: Consultancy;Gylcotope GmbH: Research Funding;ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding;Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding;Amgen: Research Funding;Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding;Agile Therapeutics: Research Funding;Merck Serono: Consultancy, Other: Travel accomodation;Lilly/ImClone: Consultancy;Merck Sharp Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria;AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding;BMS: Honoraria, Other: Travel accomodation, Research Funding;Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding;Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel accomodation;Merck KGaA: Honoraria;Abbvie: Research Funding;Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding;Celgene: Research Funding;Astellas: Research Funding;Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding;Lilly: Research Funding;Millenium: Research Funding;MSD: Research Funding;Nektar: Research Funding;Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding;Springworks Therapeutics: Research Funding;Taiho Pharmaceutical: Research Funding;Pfizer: Other. Sinn: Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding;Pfizer: Honoraria;Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding;Astra Zenica: Consultancy, Research Funding;MSD: Consultancy, Research Funding;Sanofi: Consultancy;Bayer: Research Funding;BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Leypoldt: GSK: Consultancy, Other: Meeting attendance;Sanofi: Consultancy;Abbvie: Other: Meeting attendance. Weisel: Adaptiv Biotec: Consultancy;Abbvie: Consultancy;BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Karyopharm: Honoraria;Novartis: Honoraria;Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria;Pfizer: Honoraria;Roche: Honoraria;Takeda: Honoraria;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.
ABSTRACT
So far, only a few reports about reinfections with SARS-CoV-2 have been published, and they often lack detailed immunological and virological data. We report about a SARS-CoV-2 reinfection with a genetically distinct SARS-CoV-2 variant in an immunocompetent female healthcare worker that has led to a mild disease course. No obvious viral escape mutations were observed in the second virus variant. The infectious virus was shed from the patient during the second infection episode despite the presence of neutralizing antibodies in her blood. Our data indicate that a moderate immune response after the first infection, but not a viral escape, did allow for reinfection and live virus shedding.